A perspective on History- chapter 12 of Ruggiero's Ethical Issues Essay

A perspective on History- chapter 12 of Ruggiero's Ethical Issues Ninth edition - Essay Example The history of Ethics addresses transformations in ethical issues over periods with popular and normal beliefs, trends and presuppositions shaping the model of thought for each period. The ancient Greek ethics is the oldest ethical thinking model fronted by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Philosophical thinking about ethical codes started with the Greek Sophists in the Western intellectual tradition. The Greek Sophists taught youths about the skills of public speaking in order to become successful in the political struggle of those days (Ruggiero, 2007). Moreover, earliest Sophists like Plato and Protagoras fronted the virtue of moral relativism. They underscored the fact that particular communities make their specific moral and ethical codes, setting them as customs and practices of the given community. The second stage in the history of ethics is the medieval ethics. Church fathers fronted the medieval ethical thinking. This was the trial to comprehend the Judeo-Christian scriptures in the view of the Greek philosophers (Ruggiero, 2007). St. Augustine was the major personality that fronted this ethical thinking era. He gave an ethical account of voluntarism and the will. Ethics in the twentieth century has been mainly analytical. It has been majorly concerning the nature and implication of ethical judgments. Modern ethical thinking has mainly focused on meta-ethics rather than normative ethics (Ruggiero, 2007). Modern ethics in the Western traditions draws its connection to the previous ethical thinking stages, that is, the ancient Greek ethics and the medieval ethical

'At the end of the day, competition is the only thing that motivates Essay

'At the end of the day, competition is the only thing that motivates the theories revisited' - Essay Example t to entice the new customers, build partnerships with stakeholders and remain steadfast in lobbying for the sake of their respective business enterprises. All of this adds up to the smooth working mechanisms which an organization undertakes within the midst of ever-growing and ever-present ‘competition.’ The manner in which this competition is given a new twist is dependent a great deal on the ways adopted by the individual employees – in solitude as well as in the form of groups and teams. At the end of the day, competition is the real instigator for change, and a true motivator. Nothing else can beat the hype created by a competitive environment and the users are, rest assured, quite wary of this very tussle. As a matter of fact, motivation comes about within the thick of things when there is competition to bring about the value which the customers are looking towards at having. This motivation is exponentially increased when the organizations understand the very quotient of change happening within the dynamics of business undertakings and processes. Quite rightly so, competition brings in the metaphor of change – a change which eventually promises to motivate the organizational players into giving in their very best. Whether or not this motivation is enough to reap results, and that too of an effective level, this remains highly dependent on the motivation which is being brought about by the realms of competition and competitive activities. The different theories of motivation thus take into account the element of competition coming into their domains. This means that motivation comes about when there are competitive levels doing their very best and thus bringing about a solid ch ange within the dynamics of processes and norms which are relevant with respect to business regimes. Organizational philosophies have long banked on the premise of motivation and if its instigation is happening from the competitive levels, one can be sure that this is not a